The following is how the entire SEC ranked in Bendability Index:
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/342b4/342b4197742552d74dee2040619d25997594daff" alt=""
All told, I wouldn't really say there are any major surprises. The teams generally stacked up about like you thought they would have, with a few exceptions here and there.
One point, though, that should be made regards Georgia. Though the Dawgs had one of the best defenses in the conference -- if not the nation -- in 2006, they were very low in terms of Bendability Index, ranking tenth in the conference by that measure. The problem was a struggling Georgia offense that often times committed devastating turnovers. Again, as said earlier, the Bendability Index is not solely a measure of defensive prowess, but of overall team efficiency. The 2006 Georgia Bulldogs proved that point quite nicely.
2 comments:
Is this statistic drawn from only the eight SEC games as you have done with other analysis?
Dear Robert,
Yes it is.
Essentially speaking, every statistic that I do, for the most part, involves only the eight regular season conference games, for the reasons noted earlier.
For the most part, any analysis that I do that includes smaller games will be noted as such.
Thanks for reading, though. If you ever have any questions, just drop me a line and I'll try to get back to it as soon as I see it.
Post a Comment